|
City of Flint Dot Net |
|
|
Bob Leonard seems to be confused as to what is really injustice. I just caught the last ten minutes of the Bob Leonard show. Talk about a stretch of the Imagination. Why would the Attorney General of Michigan go after Donna Poplar instead of going after Tom Joubran? He is already a convicted criminal, so who is more deserving of being charged. I'm wondering if Bob read anything concerning this case? First we have to determine whose idea was it? If it was Tom's idea, what was Ms. Poplar's responsibility? However, everything about this case I've read, points to Ms. Poplar being the person actively pursuing Tom to get the bribe. So BOB? Why would you hold a public official more accountable than a criminal? I can't believe I have to even ask this question. YOU HOLD THE GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS ACCOUNTABLE. Now. I will agree that there are some questionable cases. Just look at the amount of African Americans in appointments in City Hall. But, your not talking about that. Your making a mountain out of a mole hill. You are attempting to create racial tension that doesn't exist. Out of all the things, the States attorney General could have charged her with. It was a relatively small charge. Whether she was convicted of bribery or not, it was on tape. Anyone who has ears let them hear, if they have eyes let them read. The transcription of the tape was pretty clear. All's I can is that, from the heart. If someone in my family was convicted of the same offense, they had done the exact same thing. I wouldn't have been attempting to get that family member a job sweeping the streets or picking up trash. Let alone would the thought of supporting them for a position, that requires the utter most Character and integrity. |